Search Results

CCN 51    Theobroma cacao

 Ecuador - Napo (1992)
Corrections to accession list for Estacion Experimental Napo- San Carlos. B.G.D. Bartley, E.E.T Pichilingue, Ecuador. Personal Communication.

Derivation: Cacao Castro Naranjal.
Collected by Castro.
Location: Ecuador.

Bartley, 1993a [BAR93A]. Leaf - white [Bartley, 1993a].

Notes:  Bartley, 1993a [BAR93A]. May include some material collected from Oriente (CCN1,2,3,4?).

Bartley, 1999c [BAR99C] This group of clones is based on the cross (ICS 95 x IMC 67) x Oriente genotypes, possibly known as CCN1 or CCN 2. According to information given by Castro the Oriente material used in these selections derived from a collection made by himself in 1949 in a place called Canelos at the "Hacienda Ila", below the town or Puyo on the Rio Bobonaza in the eastern foothills of the Andes.

These clones were taken to the Miami quarantine facility in 1983 and from there were introduced into Brazil.

Bartley, 1997b [BAR97B] CCN 100, 101 and 103 are not part of Castro's selections. These clones are from Ecuador but were erroneously identified in Miami as additional CCNs. CCN 60 is also probably not related to the rest of the CCNs. It may be a FELDA selection.
 

Synonyms: CEN 51, INIAP T 680

November 2014. The accession held by this name at the University of Reading Cocoa Quarantine Centre is now known to have been mislabelled.
Purdy (1999) [PUR99A] CCN 51 was selected by Homero Castro in Ecuador. After the death of Castro his colleagues Eduardo Crespo del Campo and Fernando Crespo Andia established a propagation facility to produce rooted cuttings of CCN 51 for use by cacao growers in the Naranjal region of Ecuador. They have distributed thousands of rooted cuttings which have been planted in the field and have produced very well.
It is probable that one of the parents of CCN 51 may have been a progeny of the cross ICS 95 x IMC67. But another suggested parent, a clone designated Canellos, might be a mystery clone of unknown parentage. Based on the performance of CCN 51 in Ecuador, where it is resistant to Witches'' Broom, compared with its reported susceptibility to the disease in Bahia, it might be appropriate to conclude that CCN 51 possesses genes for resistance to Witches'' Broom that do not occur in SCA 6 or SCA 12. Perhaps CCN 51 could function as a differential clone to detect pathogenic variants of Crinipellis perniciosa.
Gerritsma and Toxopeus (1999) [GER99A] There is a 20 year old planting of 22 Ha of CCN 51 on the estate of Brakce-Egg near Iscozacin (near Puerte Bermudez) on the Palcasu River (tributary of Pachitea River) in Peru, which was apparently introduced and planted on the advice of Dr. Helfenberger (of CATIE in the 1960s). In July 1998 Toxopeus visited this plantation and all pods opened contained seeds with light purple cotyledons and more than 50 beans per pod. The pod index was around 15 pods per Kg of dry fermented cocoa. The plantation yields were high, in the order of 2 tons cured beans/Ha/year with no shade, no fertiliser or weed control. The plantation was virtually free of Witches'' Broom and Monilia, mainly due to the virtual absence of inoculum in the area. The clone was also apparently resistant to Phytophthora spp. as they were only superficially infected, but the inside of the pod and the seeds were not.
CCN 51 plants have also been observed in a field experiment in Tulamayo Experimental Station near Tingo Maria. These plants were very precocious and 18 month old plants were bearing pods. The vegetative vigour of the trees was low.
The clone is reported to have a low fat content, and the resulting powder does not have a good flavour and is of a very pale colour.
Alvim (1999a) [ALV99A] CCN 51 has been observed on a farm near Guyaquil and there is no doubt that in the coastal region of Ecuador it appears to be very tolerant not only to Witches'' Broom but also to Monilia. This high tolerance, however, might be related to the peculiar weather conditions prevailing in the coastal area of Ecuador where there is a rather long dry season (May to November), which is apparently well compensated by the practical absence of sunshine (foggy weather, with only about one or two hours of sunshine per day). Irrigation is commonly used.
CCN 51 is indeed a good clone, but unfortunately it shows absolutely no tolerance at all the Witches'' Broom in areas with high rainfall, such as observed in Bahia.
Alvim (1999b) [ALV99B] Breeders at CEPLAC appear convinced or apparently have good references indicating that CCN 51 is the result of a cross of the hybrid (IMC 67xICS 95) with an Ecuadorian cultivar locally known as "Canellos" (arriba type?). Also some of the pathologists at CEPLAC appear convinced that, under Bahia conditions, it is still one of the most tolerant to Witches'' Broom in our germplasm collection (particularly with regard to pod infection) and is undoubtedly one of the most productive.

    Disclaimer

Recommended clone in:
Brazil (Bahia)
Scale: Large-scale
Year: 2014 onwards (Current)
 Reference
Recommended clone in:
Brazil (Bahia)
Local Name: 'CCN-51'
Year: 2003 onwards (Current)
 Reference
Recommended clone in:
Dominican Republic
Recommended by: Instituto Dominicano de Investigaciones Agropecuarias y Forestales (IDIAF), Dominican Republic
 Reference
Recommended clone in:
Peru (Satipo, Chanchamayo)
Local Name: 'CCN- 51'
Recommended by: INIA
Status: Current
 Reference

 Parents:
(ICS 95 x IMC 67) x CCN 1 
 - Homero Castro
   Bartley, B.G.D., 1999
 Mother to:
CCN 10    Bartley, B.G.D., 1999
CCN 16    Bartley, B.G.D., 1999
INIAP T 074    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel et al., 2017
INIAP T 405    Freddy Amores et al., 2009
INIAP T 12    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
INIAP T 29    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
INIAP T 32    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
INIAP T 185    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
INIAP T 215    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
INIAP T 256    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
INIAP T 288    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
INIAP T 294    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
INIAP T 332    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
INIAP T 348    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
INIAP T 364    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
INIAP T 405    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
INIAP T 462    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
INIAP T 487    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
INIAP T 565    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
INIAP T 566    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
INIAP T 648    Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
SHRS-1    Daymond, Andrew, 2021
SHRS-12    Daymond, Andrew, 2021
SHRS-13    Daymond, Andrew, 2021
SHRS-22    Daymond, Andrew, 2021
SHRS-24    Daymond, Andrew, 2021
SHRS-25    Daymond, Andrew, 2021
SHRS-27    Daymond, Andrew, 2021
SHRS-28    Daymond, Andrew, 2021
SHRS-29    Daymond, Andrew, 2021
SHRS-31    Daymond, Andrew, 2021
SHRS-33    Daymond, Andrew, 2021
SHRS-35    Daymond, Andrew, 2021
SHRS-38    Daymond, Andrew, 2021
SHRS-39    Daymond, Andrew, 2021
SHRS-40    Daymond, Andrew, 2021
T1 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T10 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T11 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T12 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T13 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T14 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T15 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T16 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T17 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T18 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T19 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T2 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T20 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T21 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T22 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T24 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T25 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T27 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T28 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T3 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T30 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T4 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T5 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T6 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T7 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T8 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020
T9 [ECU]    Jaimez, Ramón E. et al., 2020

Show Details Hide Details

 Reference
BioProject: PRJNA785999   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Library Source: Transcriptomic
 
Run: SRR17587545   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Experiment: SRX13756432
BioSample: SAMN23610951
SampleSource: USDA-ARS, Beltsville, USA
Notes: Treated (inoculated with Black Pod)
Run: SRR17587546   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Experiment: SRX13756431
BioSample: SAMN23610950
SampleSource: USDA-ARS, Beltsville, USA
Notes: Control
Run: SRR17587547   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Experiment: SRX13756430
BioSample: SAMN23610949
SampleSource: USDA-ARS, Beltsville, USA
Notes: Control
Run: SRR17587548   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Experiment: SRX13756429
BioSample: SAMN23610948
SampleSource: USDA-ARS, Beltsville, USA
Notes: Control
Run: SRR17587554   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Experiment: SRX13756423
BioSample: SAMN23610953
SampleSource: USDA-ARS, Beltsville, USA
Notes: Treated (inoculated with Black Pod)
Run: SRR17587555   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Experiment: SRX13756422
BioSample: SAMN23610952
SampleSource: USDA-ARS, Beltsville, USA
Notes: Treated (inoculated with Black Pod)
 Reference
BioProject: PRJNA486011   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Project: PRJEB28591   EVA (project)   EVA (analysis) 
Library Source: Genomic
 
Run: SRR7774339   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Experiment: SRX4629485
BioSample: SAMN09934558
SampleName: T680_A1
SampleSource: Ecuador
Run: SRR7774349   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Experiment: SRX4629475
BioSample: SAMN09934417
SampleSource: Brazil, MARS
 Reference
BioProject: PRJNA857502   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Library Source: Genomic
 
Run: SRR20075023   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Experiment: SRX16112996
BioSample: SAMN29628480
SampleName: TC51_CpG
SampleSource: Mars Center for Cocoa Science, Brazil
Notes: Normal Somatic Embryo
Cross: CCN 10  x CCN 51
Run: SRR20075024   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Experiment: SRX16112995
BioSample: SAMN29628478
SampleName: TC41_CpG
SampleSource: Mars Center for Cocoa Science, Brazil
Notes: Zygotic Embryo
 Reference
BioProject: PRJNA734904   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Library Source: Genomic
 
Run: SRR14743709   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Experiment: SRX11078413
BioSample: SAMN19549107
SampleSource: AGROSAVIA, Colombia

 HELD IN

Show Details Hide Details

Current List   ICQC,R Website
• Accession: RUQ 1736     ICQC,R 
   - Local Name: CCN 51
   - Year of Accession: 2016
• Accession: RUQ 1737     ICQC,R 
   - Local Name: CCN 51
   - Year of Accession: 2016
List received in 2012   Reference
• Accession: 578
   - Local Name: CCN 51
   - Year of Accession: 1987
• Accession: 1216
   - Cross: CCN 51 x ICS 95 
   - Local Name: CCN 51 X ICS 95 1
• Accession: 1216
   - Cross: CCN 51 x ICS 95 
   - Local Name: CCN 51 X ICS 95 1
• Accession: 1224
   - Cross: CCN 51 x ICS 95 
   - Local Name: CCN 51 X ICS 95 2
• Accession: 1224
   - Cross: CCN 51 x ICS 95 
   - Local Name: CCN 51 X ICS 95 2
List received in 2015   Reference
• Accession: CCN 51 Quadra 5
   - Local Name: CCN 51
• Accession: CCN 51 Viveiro 1
   - Local Name: CCN 51
• Accession: CCN 51 Viveiro 2
   - Local Name: CCN 51
List received in 2012   Reference
• Local Name: CCN-51
   - Year of Accession: 1993
List received in 2018   Reference
• Accession: 21966
   - Local Name: CCN-51 T1
   - Year of Accession: 2006
List received in 2020   Reference
• Local Name: CCN-51
List received in 2012   Reference
• Local Name: CCN - 51
List received in 2012   Reference
• Local Name: CCN 51
List received in 2012   Reference
• Local Name: CCN 51
   - Year of Accession: 1990
List received in 2012   Reference
• Local Name: CCN 51
List received in 1994   Reference
• Local Name: CCN 51
List received in 1998   Reference
• Local Name: CCN 51
List received in 2009   Reference
• Local Name: CCN - 51

Show Details Hide Details

Susceptible (Seedling).
Note: Origin of material: Almirante Cacau, Barro Preto
 Stela Dalva V. M. Silva et al., 2006
Susceptible (Branch).
Note: Based on mycelium growth and the production of perithecia..
 Stela Dalva Vieira Midlej Silva, 2003
Cross: CCN 51 x UF 273 
12.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
18.20 % Infection (Pod).
Note: Infected pods per tree: 0.7.
 Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
36.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
43.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Natural incidence of the disease over 9 years. Although this clone shares many morpho-physiological characteristics with the true type, it is an off-type as determined by USDA-ARS
 Wilbert Phillips et al., 2009
45.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Natural incidence of the disease over 11 years..
 Wilbert Phillips-Mora et al., 2013
56.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Natural incidence of the disease over last 5 years (6 to 11)..
 Wilbert Phillips-Mora et al., 2013
Cross: PA 169 [PER]  x CCN 51
70.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Moderately Susceptible (Pod).
Note: Artificial innoculation..
 Wilbert Phillips-Mora et al., 2013
40.00 % Infection
 Castro, H., 1986
0.10 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora (Field reaction).
Note: Natural incidence of the disease over 3 years. Although this clone shares many morpho-physiological characteristics with the true type, it is an off-type as determined by USDA-ARS
 Wilbert Phillips et al., 2009
2.00 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora (Field reaction).
Note: Natural incidence of the disease over last 5 years (6 to 11)..
 Wilbert Phillips-Mora et al., 2013
4.00 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora (Field reaction).
Note: Natural incidence of the disease over 11 years..
 Wilbert Phillips-Mora et al., 2013
Cross: PA 169 [PER]  x CCN 51
Resistant, 0.70 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora (5 month old detached pod (reaction)).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Susceptible, sp. P. palmivora (Pod).
Note: Paper disk method..
 Wilbert Phillips-Mora et al., 2013
Susceptible, 5.30 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora (5 month old detached pod (reaction)).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CCN 51 x UF 273 
Susceptible, 8.30 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora (5 month old detached pod (reaction)).
Note: Described as highly susceptible. Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Notes
Number of vegetative brooms: 4.8, infected flower cushions: 0.3 and infected pods: 0.
 Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, 2010
4.00 % Infection
 Castro, H., 1986
Resistant (Seedling).
 Luz, E.D.M.N. & Silva, S.D.V.M., 1997
Resistant (Field Reaction).
 Monteiro, W.R. & Silva, S.D.V.M., 1998
Resistant (Field Reaction).
 Luz, E.D.M.N. & Silva, S.D.V.M., 1997

Show Details Hide Details

Pod Index: 14.5 (pods per kg dried beans)
Yield (wet beans per tree): 12.00 kg
 Reference
Yield: 1332 kg ha-1 yr-1
Note: Zone of Chongon, Ecuador
 Reference
Yield: 1299 kg ha-1 yr-1
Note: Zone of Calceta, Ecuador
 Reference
Pod Index: 18.0 (pods per kg dried beans)
Yield: 756 kg ha-1 yr-1
 Reference
Cross: CCN 51 x UF 273 
Pod Index: 34.0 (pods per kg dried beans)
Yield: 1103 kg ha-1 yr-1
Note: tree number 13
 Reference
Cross: PA 169 [PER]  x CCN 51
Pod Index: 36.0 (pods per kg dried beans)
Yield: 1622 kg ha-1 yr-1
Note: tree number 9
 Reference
Yield: 1265 kg ha-1 yr-1
Note: 3 year mean
 Reference
Pod Index: 18.0 (pods per kg dried beans)
Yield: 1034 kg ha-1 yr-1
 Reference
Seed Index: 1.6 (dried beans per 100g)
Pod Index: 14.4 (pods per kg dried beans)
Wet Weight Beans Per Tree: 2983.3 g
Yield Efficiency: 111.3 g/cm2
Note: Cherelle wilt per tree, 68.8
 Reference

Show Details Hide Details

Dry Weight: 1.62 g
 Reference
Number: 31.0
Length: 28.0 mm
Width: 11.0 mm
Thickness: 14.0 mm
Dry Weight: 2.14 g
 Reference
Cross: CCN 51 x UF 273 
Acc: tree number 13
Number: 24.0
Length: 22.0 mm
Width: 8.0 mm
Thickness: 11.0 mm
Dry Weight: 1.70 g
Note: tree number 13
 Reference
Cross: PA 169 [PER]  x CCN 51
Acc: tree number 9
Number: 22.0
Dry Weight: 1.30 g
Note: tree number 9
 Reference
Colour: light purple
Shape: round
Number: 50.4
Total Wet Weight: 254.0 g
Total Dry Weight: 76.3 g
Wet Weight: 5.05 g
Dry Weight: 1.50 g
 Reference

Cross: CCN 51 x UF 273 
Butterfat Content: 51.00 %
Note: tree number 13
 Reference
Butterfat Content: 56.00 %
 Reference

Show Details Hide Details

Shape: amelonado
Basal Constriction: slight
Apex Form: rounded
Rugosity: moderate
Husk Thickness: 16 mm
Length: 204.0 mm
Breadth: 94.0 mm
Colour: red
Weight: 679.0 g
Hardness: soft
Length Breadth Ratio: 2.17
 Reference
Cross: CCN 51 x UF 273 
Acc: tree number 13
Shape: amelonado
Basal Constriction: absent
Apex Form: acute
Rugosity: moderate
Husk Thickness: 15 mm
Length: 159.0 mm
Breadth: 76.0 mm
Colour: red
Weight: 377.0 g
Hardness: soft
Length Breadth Ratio: 2.09
Note: tree number 13
 Reference
Cross: PA 169 [PER]  x CCN 51
Acc: tree number 9
Husk Thickness: 13 mm
Length: 161.0 mm
Breadth: 86.0 mm
Colour: green
Weight: 326.0 g
Length Breadth Ratio: 1.87
Note: tree number 9
 Reference
Shape: angoleta
Rugosity: moderate
Husk Thickness: 14.0 mm
Length: 205.0 mm
Breadth: 83.0 mm
Colour: red
Weight: 832.7 g
Length Breadth Ratio: 2.47
 Reference

Colour: moderate anthocyanin
 Reference

Show Details Hide Details

Self Compatibility: self compatible
 Reference
Cross: CCN 51 x UF 273 
Acc: tree number 13
Self Compatibility: self compatible
 Reference
Cross: PA 169 [PER]  x CCN 51
Acc: tree number 9
Self Compatibility: self compatible
 Reference

Ecuador - Napo (1992) Corrections to accession list for Estacion Experimental Napo- San Carlos. B.G.D. Bartley, E.E.T Pichilingue, Ecuador. Personal Communication.
CEPLAC, Brazil (2014) Indicação de Variedades Clonais de Cacaueiro. COMUNICADO CEPLAC/CEPEC NO 02/2014
Lopes, Uilson Vanderlei, Wilson Reis Monteiro, José Luis Pires, Didier Clement, Milton Macoto Yamada & Karina Peres Gramacho (2011) Cacao Breeding in Bahia, Brazil - Strategies and Results. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 11: 73–81
Batista, Lepido J. (2009) Guía Técnica el Cultivo de Cacao en la República Dominicana. Santo Domingo, República Dominicana. Centro para el Desarrollo Agropecuario y Forestal (CEDAF)
INIA (2020) MINAGRI DESARROLLA MÁS 7 MIL PLANTONES DE CACAO DE ALTA CALIDAD PARA SATIPO Y CHACHAMAYO [Minagri Develops More Than 7 Thousand High Quality Cocoa Seedlings for Satipo and Chachamayo]. INIA Website
Bartley, B.G.D. (1999) CCN 51. Background, History, Characteristics. Unpublished report for the ICGD. p13.
Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel, Ignacio A Sotomayor-Cantos, T Casanova, G Rodríguez, L Plaza & Zambrano (2017) Selection of Cocoa Genotypes (Theobroma Cacao L) Resistant to Witches’ Broom Disease (Moniliophthora Perniciosa) in Los Ríos, Ecuador. Ciencia y Tecnología, 10: 17–26
Freddy Amores, Geover Peña, Darío Calderón, Juan Agama, Carmen Suarez, Juan Motamayor, Raymond Schnell, James Quiroz, Gastón Loor & Omar Tarqui (2009) Research to Identify and Develop High Yielding Fine and Flavour Cocoa Clones in Ecuador. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Cocoa Research Conference, Bali, Indonesia (November 2009). Cocoa Producers' Alliance, Lagos, Nigeria.
Tarqui-Freire, Omar Miguel (2010) EVALUACIÓN DE CLONES DE CACAO (Theobroma Cacao L.) PROVENIENTES DE PLÁNTULAS HÍBRIDAS SELECCIONADAS POR RESISTENCIA A LA ENFERMEDAD ESCOBA DE BRUJA (Moniliopththora Perniciosa). Universidad Tecnica Estatal de Quevedo, Ecuador
Daymond, Andrew (2021) Notes on SHRS clones in ICQC,R. Pers. Com.
Jaimez, Ramón E., Danilo I Vera, Argenis Mora, Rey Gastón Loor-Solórzano & Bryan A Bailey (2020) A Disease and Production Index (DPI) for Selection of Cacao (Theobroma Cacao) Clones Highly Productive and Tolerant to Pod Rot Diseases. Plant Pathology, February, ppa.13156
Baruah I.K., Ali S.S., Shao J., Lary D. & Bailey B.A. (2022) Changes in Gene Expression in Leaves of Cacao Genotypes Resistant and Susceptible to Phytophthora palmivora Infection. Frontiers in Plant Science 12: 780805
Cornejo, O.E., Muh-Ching Yee, Victor Dominguez, Mary Andrews, Alexandra Sockell, Erika Strandberg, Donald Livingstone III, Conrad Stack, Alberto Romero, Pathmanathan Umaharan, Stefan Royaert, Nilesh R. Tawari, Pauline Ng, Osman Gutierrez, Wilbert Phillips, Keithanne Mockaitis, Carlos D. Bustamante & Juan C. Motamayor (2018) Population genomic analyses of the chocolate tree, Theobroma cacao L., provide insights into its domestication process. Commun Biol 1, 167
Claudia Garcia, Alex-Alan Furtado de Almeida, Marcio Costa, Dahyana Britto, Fabio Correa, Pedro Mangabeira, Lidiane Silva, Jose Silva, Stefan Royaert & Jean-Philippe Marelli (2022) Single-base resolution methylomes of somatic embryogenesis in Theobroma cacao L. reveal epigenome modifications associated with somatic embryo abnormalities. Scientific Reports 12:15097
Jaime A Osorio-Guarín, Jhon A Berdugo-Cely, Roberto A Coronado-Silva, Eliana Baez, Yeirme Jaimes, Roxana Yockteng (2020) Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Novel Candidate Genes Associated with Productivity and Disease Resistance to Moniliophthora spp. in Cacao (Theobroma cacao L.). G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics, Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 1713–1725
CEPEC (2012) Accession list for the CEPEC (Bahia, Brazil) collection. Dr. José Luis Pires, personal communication, February 2012.
Almeida, Caio Márcio Vasconcellos Cordeiro de, Francisco Antônio Neto, Acácio de Paula, Silva, José Raymundo Pires Medeiros & Antonio de Almeida Lima (2015) RECURSOS GENÉTICOS DE CACAUEIRO EM RONDÔNIA: RETROSPECTIVA HISTÓRICA, ORIGEM E INVENTÁRIO [Genetic Resources of Cacao in Rondônia: Historical Overview, Origin and Inventory]. Agrotrópica (Itabuna) 27 (2): 93–124
Mars Center for Cocoa Science (2012) Accession list for the Mars Center for Cocoa Science. Jean-Philippe Marelli, personal communication, February 2012.
Allan Mata (2018) Accession list for the International Cacao Collection at CATIE (IC3). Personal communication.
García-Cruzatty, Luz Cecilia, Luis Vera-Pinargote, Freddy Zambrano-Gavilanes, Andrés Zamora-Macías & John Cedeño-Ortega (2020) Pollen Production in Theobroma Cacao L. Genotypes National Type and CCN-51 and Its Relationship with Climatic Factors on the Ecuadorian Coast. Acta Agrobotanica 73 (2)
EET - Pichilingue (2012) Accessions planted in EET - Pichilingue, Ecuador. Freddy Amores and Ignacio Sotomayor C, personal communication, February 2012.
Philippe Lachenaud (2012) CIRAD Montpellier Clone List (Excel Spreadsheet). Data supplied to ICGD by email. Dr. Philippe Lachenaud, CIRAD Montpellier, France, January 2012.
Philippe Lachenaud (2012) F. Guiana database, CIRAD-CP. Data supplied to ICGD by email. Dr. Philippe Lachenaud, CIRAD Montpellier, France, January 2012.
CRIG (2012) Cocoa accessions held in the Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana (CRIG). Francis Kwame Padi, personal communication, February 2012.
Honduras - CEDEC (1994) List of accessions in CEDEC, La Masica, Honduras. J.A. Sanchez, FHIA, Honduras. Personal Communication.
Malaysia - ARC Tuaran (1998) Accessions held in the Malaysian Cocoa Board collection, May 1998. K. Lamin, MCB, Malaysia, Personal Communication.
Luis F. García Carrión (2009) Catalogo de Cultivares de Cacao del Peru.
Stela Dalva V. M. Silva, Augusto Roberto S. Gomes, Edmundo P. Mandarino, Lindolfo P. dos S. Filho & Virgínia O. Damaceno (2006) Indicações de Resistência à Murcha-de-Ceratocystis em Genótipos de Cacaueiros no Sul da Bahia, Brasil. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Cocoa Research Conference, San Jose, Costa Rica (2006). Cocoa Producers' Alliance, Lagos, Nigeria.
Stela Dalva Vieira Midlej Silva (2003) Ensaios Para Avaliação do Cacaueiro à Murcha-de-Ceratocystis na Bahia, Brasil. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Cocoa Research Conference, Accra, Ghana (October 2003). Cocoa Producers' Alliance, Lagos, Nigeria.
Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W. (2006) Caracterización de Genotipos Superiores de Cacao Seleccionados por el Programa de Mejoramiento Genético del CATIE por Su Rendimiento Y/O Resistencia a Moniliasis. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Cocoa Research Conference, San Jose, Costa Rica (2006). Cocoa Producers' Alliance, Lagos, Nigeria.
Wilbert Phillips, José Castillo, Adriana Arciniegas, Allan Mata, Aldo Sánchez, Mariela Leandro, Carlos Astorga, Juan Motamayor, Bill Guyton, Ed Seguine & Ray Schnell (2009) Overcoming the Main Limiting Factors of Cacao Production in Central America through the use of Improved Clones Developed at CATIE. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Cocoa Research Conference, Bali, Indonesia (November 2009). Cocoa Producers' Alliance, Lagos, Nigeria.
Wilbert Phillips-Mora, Adriana Arciniegas-Leal, Allan Mata-Quirós & Juan Carlos Motamayor-Arias (2013) Catalogue of Cacao Clones Selected by CATIE for Commercial Plantings. Technical series. Technical manual/CATIE no.105
Castro, H. (1986) Records sheets of traits and performance of selections. Data supplied to B.G.D. Bartley. Listed in Bartley, 1999c, [BAR99C] report to the ICGD on CCN 51.
Luz, E.D.M.N. & Silva, S.D.V.M. (1997) Evaluating resistance/tolerance to Witches' Broom disease in Bahia, Brazil. Final Report to ACRI. CEPLAC/CEPEC, February, 1997. pp. 56. Data supplied to ICGD by Luz & Silva.
Monteiro, W.R. & Silva, S.D.V.M. (1998) Individual Institute Reports - Brazil, CEPEC. Report on the IPGRI project: Cocoa Germplasm Utilisation and Conservation, A Global Approach. Appendix to General Progress Report of Year 1.
Frances Bekele & Gillian Bidaisee (2022) Morphological data from the International Cocoa Collection (ICG,T) maintained by the Cocoa Research Centre (CRC), Trinidad & Tobago. Unpublished data on fruit, bean, flower and flush morphology supplied as an Excel spreadsheet by Frances Bekele. Last update March 2022.