Search Results

CATIE 1000    Theobroma cacao

Derivation: CATIE.
Location: CATIE, CRI.

Notes:  CATIE clones names were previously included in the ICGD as ICGD preferred names. As the CATIE names are now known to be accession names the synonymy has been altered for those clones with pre-exsiting names (as advised by Bartley, 1998a [BAR98A]). CATIE remains the ICGD preferred name for selections made at CATIE.
 

 NOTES

CATIE clones names were previously included in the ICGD as ICGD preferred names. As the CATIE names are now known to be accession names the synonymy has been altered for those clones with pre-exsiting names (as advised by Bartley, 1998a [BAR98A]). CATIE remains the ICGD preferred name for selections made at CATIE.

 PEDIGREE DETAILS

 Parents:
POUND 12  x CATONGO    Morera, J. et al., 1991
 Father to:
CATIE-R1    Wilbert Phillips-Mora et al., 2013

 GENOME DATA LINKS

 Cornejo, O.E. et al., 2018  Reference
BioProject: PRJNA486011   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Project: PRJNA486011   EVA (project)   EVA (analysis) 
 
Run: SRR7800376   NCBI   ENA FASTQ 
Experiment: SRX4629650
BioSample: SAMN09934410
SampleSource: Costa Rica, Tree_ID: 17423

 HELD IN

Show Details Hide Details

Current List   ICQC,R Website
• Accession: RUQ 844     ICQC,R 
   - Local Name: CATIE 1000
   - Year of Accession: 1998
List received in 2012   Reference
• Accession: 1192
   - Local Name: CATIE 1000
List received in 1999   Reference
• Local Name: CATIE 1000
List received in 2018   Reference
• Accession: 19420
   - Local Name: CATIE-1000
   - Year of Accession: 1993
List received in 1999   Reference
• Local Name: CATIE 1000
List received in 2012   Reference
• Local Name: CATIE 1000
   - Year of Accession: 1993
List received in 2012   Reference
• Local Name: CATIE 1000
   - Year of Accession: 2000
List received in 1994   Reference
• Local Name: CATIE 1000
List received in 1999   Reference
• Local Name: CATIE 1000
List received in 1992   Reference
• Local Name: CATIE 1000
   - Year of Accession: 1987
List received in 1999   Reference
• Local Name: CATIE 1000
List received in 1998   Reference
• Local Name: CATIE 1000
   - Year of Accession: 1998
List received in 2010   Reference
• Accession: MIA 35749     GRIN-Global 
   - Local Name: CATIE 1000
   - Year of Accession: 2001

 DISEASE

Show Details Hide Details

 Ceratocystis
Susceptible (Branch).
Note: Based on mycelium growth and the production of perithecia..
 Stela Dalva Vieira Midlej Silva, 2003
 Frosty Pod Rot
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 712 
15.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
18.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
32.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
34.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
36.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
36.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CC 137  x CATIE 1000
37.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
43.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
45.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
79.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Natural incidence of the disease over 9 years.
 Wilbert Phillips et al., 2009
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
82.00 % Infection (Field reaction).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Susceptible, 87.00 % Infection
Note: External Severety = 4.6 and Internal Severety = 4.8
 Phillips, W., 1997
Susceptible, 87.00 % Infection
Note: External Severety = 4.6 and Internal Severety = 4.8
 Phillips, W., 1996
 Phytophthora
0.00 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora (Field reaction).
Note: Natural incidence of the disease over 3 years.
 Wilbert Phillips et al., 2009
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
0.00 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
0.50 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
1.20 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 712 
Moderate Resistance, 1.00 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora (5 month old detached pod (reaction)).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
Moderately Susceptible, 0.00 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora (5 month old detached pod (reaction)).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Moderately Susceptible, 3.30 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora (5 month old detached pod (reaction)).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Resistant, sp. P. palmivora (Pod).
Note: Unripe, Attached and not wounded
 Morera, J., 1993
Resistant, sp. P. palmivora (Pod).
 Phillips, W., 1997
Cross: CC 137  x CATIE 1000
Susceptible, 0.00 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora (5 month old detached pod (reaction)).
Note: Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
Susceptible, 0.00 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora (5 month old detached pod (reaction)).
Note: Described as highly susceptible. Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Susceptible, 1.00 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora (5 month old detached pod (reaction)).
Note: Described as highly susceptible. Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Susceptible, 2.20 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora (5 month old detached pod (reaction)).
Note: Described as highly susceptible. Percentage infection is the natural incidence of the disease observed in the field over 4 to 5 years.
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Susceptible, 66.00 % Infection, sp. P. palmivora (Pod).
Note: Unripe and not wounded
 Lopez-Baez, O. et al., 1996

 YIELD

Show Details Hide Details

 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
Pod Index: 28.0 (pods per kg dried beans)
Yield: 1216 kg ha-1 yr-1
Note: tree number 29
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
Pod Index: 25.0 (pods per kg dried beans)
Yield: 1030 kg ha-1 yr-1
Note: tree number 31
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 712 
Pod Index: 19.0 (pods per kg dried beans)
Yield: 1278 kg ha-1 yr-1
Note: tree number 7
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Pod Index: 27.0 (pods per kg dried beans)
Yield: 3672 kg ha-1 yr-1
Note: tree number 18
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Pod Index: 25.0 (pods per kg dried beans)
Yield: 2105 kg ha-1 yr-1
Note: tree number 20
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Pod Index: 32.0 (pods per kg dried beans)
Yield: 2118 kg ha-1 yr-1
Note: tree number 24
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CC 137  x CATIE 1000
Pod Index: 21.0 (pods per kg dried beans)
Yield: 1877 kg ha-1 yr-1
Note: tree number 23
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
Pod Index: 23.0 (pods per kg dried beans)
Yield: 1921 kg ha-1 yr-1
Note: tree number 26
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Pod Index: 27.0 (pods per kg dried beans)
Yield: 1919 kg ha-1 yr-1
Note: tree number 28
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Pod Index: 28.0 (pods per kg dried beans)
Yield: 1490 kg ha-1 yr-1
Note: tree number 30
 Reference
 Wilbert Phillips et al., 2009
Yield: 422 kg ha-1 yr-1
Note: 3 year mean
 Reference

 BEAN

Show Details Hide Details

 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
Acc: tree number 29
Number: 30.0
Dry Weight: 1.20 g
Note: tree number 29
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
Acc: tree number 31
Number: 36.0
Length: 24.0 mm
Width: 8.0 mm
Thickness: 12.0 mm
Dry Weight: 1.20 g
Note: tree number 31
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 712 
Acc: tree number 7
Number: 38.0
Length: 23.0 mm
Width: 9.0 mm
Thickness: 13.0 mm
Dry Weight: 1.40 g
Note: tree number 7
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Acc: tree number 18
Number: 37.0
Dry Weight: 1.00 g
Note: tree number 18
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Acc: tree number 20
Number: 41.0
Length: 21.0 mm
Width: 8.0 mm
Thickness: 11.0 mm
Dry Weight: 1.00 g
Note: tree number 20
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Acc: tree number 24
Number: 30.0
Length: 23.0 mm
Width: 7.0 mm
Thickness: 11.0 mm
Dry Weight: 1.20 g
Note: tree number 24
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CC 137  x CATIE 1000
Acc: tree number 23
Number: 36.0
Length: 22.0 mm
Width: 8.0 mm
Thickness: 12.0 mm
Dry Weight: 1.30 g
Note: tree number 23
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
Acc: tree number 26
Number: 41.0
Length: 21.0 mm
Width: 10.0 mm
Thickness: 10.0 mm
Dry Weight: 1.10 g
Note: tree number 26
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Acc: tree number 28
Number: 35.0
Length: 20.0 mm
Width: 8.0 mm
Thickness: 11.0 mm
Dry Weight: 1.10 g
Note: tree number 28
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Acc: tree number 30
Number: 36.0
Length: 22.0 mm
Width: 7.0 mm
Thickness: 11.0 mm
Dry Weight: 1.00 g
Note: tree number 30
 Reference

 BUTTERFAT

Show Details Hide Details

 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CC 137  x CATIE 1000
Butterfat Content: 56.00 %
Note: tree number 23
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Butterfat Content: 55.00 %
Note: tree number 24
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Butterfat Content: 54.00 %
Note: tree number 20
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 712 
Butterfat Content: 55.00 %
Note: tree number 7
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
Butterfat Content: 60.00 %
Note: tree number 31
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Butterfat Content: 57.00 %
Note: tree number 30
 Reference

 FRUIT

Show Details Hide Details

 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
Acc: tree number 29
Husk Thickness: 15 mm
Length: 142.0 mm
Breadth: 92.0 mm
Colour: green
Weight: 405.0 g
Length Breadth Ratio: 1.54
Note: tree number 29
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
Acc: tree number 31
Shape: amelonado
Basal Constriction: absent
Apex Form: obtuse
Rugosity: moderate
Husk Thickness: 22 mm
Length: 172.0 mm
Breadth: 97.0 mm
Colour: green
Weight: 695.0 g
Hardness: soft
Length Breadth Ratio: 1.77
Note: tree number 31
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 712 
Acc: tree number 7
Shape: amelonado
Basal Constriction: absent
Apex Form: mammillate
Rugosity: moderate
Husk Thickness: 17 mm
Length: 160.0 mm
Breadth: 101.0 mm
Colour: green
Weight: 608.0 g
Hardness: soft
Length Breadth Ratio: 1.58
Note: tree number 7
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Acc: tree number 18
Husk Thickness: 15 mm
Length: 172.0 mm
Breadth: 92.0 mm
Colour: red
Weight: 480.0 g
Length Breadth Ratio: 1.86
Note: tree number 18
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Acc: tree number 20
Shape: amelonado
Basal Constriction: absent
Apex Form: rounded
Rugosity: moderate
Husk Thickness: 21 mm
Length: 150.0 mm
Breadth: 98.0 mm
Colour: red
Weight: 632.0 g
Hardness: soft
Length Breadth Ratio: 1.53
Note: tree number 20
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Acc: tree number 24
Shape: amelonado
Basal Constriction: absent
Apex Form: rounded
Rugosity: moderate
Husk Thickness: 15 mm
Length: 124.0 mm
Breadth: 82.0 mm
Colour: red
Weight: 466.0 g
Hardness: soft
Length Breadth Ratio: 1.51
Note: tree number 24
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CC 137  x CATIE 1000
Acc: tree number 23
Shape: amelonado
Basal Constriction: absent
Apex Form: rounded
Rugosity: moderate
Husk Thickness: 14 mm
Length: 164.0 mm
Breadth: 89.0 mm
Colour: green
Weight: 508.0 g
Hardness: soft
Length Breadth Ratio: 1.84
Note: tree number 23
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
Acc: tree number 26
Shape: amelonado
Basal Constriction: slight
Apex Form: obtuse
Rugosity: moderate
Husk Thickness: 21 mm
Length: 162.0 mm
Breadth: 96.0 mm
Colour: red
Weight: 550.0 g
Hardness: moderate
Length Breadth Ratio: 1.68
Note: tree number 26
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Acc: tree number 28
Shape: amelonado
Basal Constriction: absent
Apex Form: rounded
Rugosity: moderate
Husk Thickness: 18 mm
Length: 136.0 mm
Breadth: 79.0 mm
Colour: red
Weight: 454.0 g
Hardness: soft
Length Breadth Ratio: 1.72
Note: tree number 28
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Acc: tree number 30
Shape: amelonado
Basal Constriction: absent
Apex Form: rounded
Rugosity: moderate
Husk Thickness: 19 mm
Length: 152.0 mm
Breadth: 94.0 mm
Colour: red
Weight: 415.0 g
Hardness: soft
Length Breadth Ratio: 1.61
Note: tree number 30
 Reference
 Morera, J. et al., 1991
Shape: amelonado
Colour: green
 Reference

 PHENOTYPING

 Fiona Lahive, 2017
Accession: RUQ 844
Light Saturated Photosynthetic Rate: 4.24 μmol m2 s-1
Stomatal Conductance: 0.05 mol m2 s-1
Transpiration Rate: 0.98 mmol m2 s-1
Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency: 79.70 μmol mol-1
Instantaneous Water Use Efficiency: 4.21 mmol mol-1
Flush Size: 6
Leaf Area: 256.30 cm2
Leaf Dry Weight: 1.90 g
Specific Leaf Area: 136.40 cm2 g-1
 Reference

 FLOWER

Show Details Hide Details

 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
Acc: tree number 29
Self Compatibility: self incompatible
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 273 
Acc: tree number 31
Self Compatibility: self incompatible
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x UF 712 
Acc: tree number 7
Self Compatibility: self incompatible
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Acc: tree number 18
Self Compatibility: self incompatible
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Acc: tree number 20
Self Compatibility: self compatible
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CATIE 1000 x EET 75 [ECU] 
Acc: tree number 24
Self Compatibility: self compatible
 Reference
 Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W., 2006
Cross: CC 137  x CATIE 1000
Acc: tree number 23
Self Compatibility: self compatible
 Reference
 Morera, J. et al., 1991
Self Compatibility: self compatible
 Reference

Morera, J., Paredes, A. & Mora, A. (1991) Germoplasma de cacao en el CATIE entre 1947 y 1991, Programa II: Generacion y transferencia de tecnologia.. IICA, San Jose, Costa Rica, pp. 49.
Wilbert Phillips-Mora, Adriana Arciniegas-Leal, Allan Mata-Quirós & Juan Carlos Motamayor-Arias (2013) Catalogue of Cacao Clones Selected by CATIE for Commercial Plantings. Technical series. Technical manual/CATIE no.105
Cornejo, O.E., Muh-Ching Yee, Victor Dominguez, Mary Andrews, Alexandra Sockell, Erika Strandberg, Donald Livingstone III, Conrad Stack, Alberto Romero, Pathmanathan Umaharan, Stefan Royaert, Nilesh R. Tawari, Pauline Ng, Osman Gutierrez, Wilbert Phillips, Keithanne Mockaitis, Carlos D. Bustamante & Juan C. Motamayor (2018) Population genomic analyses of the chocolate tree, Theobroma cacao L., provide insights into its domestication process. Commun Biol 1, 167
CEPEC (2012) Accession list for the CEPEC (Bahia, Brazil) collection.. Dr. José Luis Pires, personal communication, February 2012.
Eskes, A.B. (1999) Advanced Draft. Working Procedures and Recording Sheets for the CFC/ICCO/IPGRI Project.. CFC/ICCO/IPGRI Cocoa Project.
Allan Mata (2018) Accession list for the International Cacao Collection at CATIE (IC3).. Personal communication.
Philippe Lachenaud (2012) CIRAD Montpellier Clone List (Excel Spreadsheet).. Data supplied to ICGD by email. Dr. Philippe Lachenaud, CIRAD Montpellier, France, January 2012.
CRIG (2012) Cocoa accessions held in the Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana (CRIG).. Francis Kwame Padi, personal communication, February 2012.
Honduras - CEDEC (1994) List of accessions in CEDEC, La Masica, Honduras.. J.A. Sanchez, FHIA, Honduras. Personal Communication.
Lopez-Baez, O., Mulato-Brito, J. & Lopez-Arroyo, J. (1992) Recursos geneticos del cacao, Theobroma cacao L. disponibles en Mexico.. Agricultura Tecnico Mexicana 18(1-2): pp. 25-38.
PNG - Cocoa & Coconut Research (1998) Current list of cocoa accessions at the PNG CCRI.. Mr. Mathias Faure, Personal Communication.
USDA-ARS, SHRS, NCGR, National Germplasm Repository, Miami, Florida, USA. (2010) List of cocoa accessions held at Miami and Coconut Grove (Plant Introduction Station) in July, 2010.. USDA, ARS, National Genetic Resources Program. Germplasm Resources Information Network - (GRIN). [Online Database] National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland.
Stela Dalva Vieira Midlej Silva (2003) Ensaios Para Avaliação do Cacaueiro à Murcha-de-Ceratocystis na Bahia, Brasil. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Cocoa Research Conference, Accra, Ghana (October 2003). Cocoa Producers' Alliance, Lagos, Nigeria.
Arciniegas, A. & Phillips-Mora, W. (2006) Caracterización de Genotipos Superiores de Cacao Seleccionados por el Programa de Mejoramiento Genético del CATIE por Su Rendimiento Y/O Resistencia a Moniliasis. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Cocoa Research Conference, San Jose, Costa Rica (2006). Cocoa Producers' Alliance, Lagos, Nigeria.
Wilbert Phillips, José Castillo, Adriana Arciniegas, Allan Mata, Aldo Sánchez, Mariela Leandro, Carlos Astorga, Juan Motamayor, Bill Guyton, Ed Seguine & Ray Schnell (2009) Overcoming the Main Limiting Factors of Cacao Production in Central America through the use of Improved Clones Developed at CATIE. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Cocoa Research Conference, Bali, Indonesia (November 2009). Cocoa Producers' Alliance, Lagos, Nigeria.
Phillips, W. (1997) Results of the artificial inoculation of Moniliophthora rorei using the Aspersion method.. Unpublished data supplied by W. Phillips, CATIE, Costa Rica. Personal communication
Phillips, W. (1996) Cocoa cultivar reaction when innoculated with Moniliophthora roreri. . Unpublished data supplied by W. Phillips, CATIE, Costa Rica. Personal communication
Morera, J. (1993) Reaction of clones to Phytophthora palmivora. . J. Morera, CATIE, Costa Rica. Personal Communication.
Phillips, W. (1997) Results of the artificial inoculation of Phytophthora palmivora using the Paper Disc method.. Unpublished data supplied by W. Phillips, CATIE, Costa Rica. Personal communication
Lopez-Baez, O., Fraire, V.G. & Cueto, M.J. (1996) Mejoramiento genetico para la resistencia a Phytophthora en Mexico.. Proceedings of the International Workshop on the Contribution of Disease Resistance to Cocoa Variety Improvement, INGENIC, Salvador, 24th-26th September, 1996. pp.51-55.
Fiona Lahive (2017) Phenotypic data from climate change trials.. Personal communication.